blog comic thngy

blog

lopes up

   Investing in stocks is a risky business that puts you in a position to make educated decisions and guesses and asks yourself is it really worth it? Much like your education. Once the mandatory primary and secondary school is over, the opportunities are limited unless you choose to invest in a higher education such as a trade school or college. College is an investment in your life, a commitment to better yourself, so why not make a little money off it. Like stocks, the outcome is unpredictable and can be a situation of up and downs, so it is important to really research your investment. I invested in 1500 shares of Grand Canyon University stock because I figure as invested as I am in my own education, I should physically do so and in doing so my profile rank has gone up and so has the value of my purchase which ultimately is a win for me.

   "The problem is a well-known one, and indeed one we have discussed here before: as soon as you try to measure how people are doing, they will switch to optimizing for whatever you're measuring, rather than putting their best efforts into actually doing good work." When it comes to education, it is hard to come by good quality education at a decent price that is not a play by play or rubric by rubric. Grand Canyon has an abstract teaching style that focus's on the real active environment of your future career. It provides hands-on experience both through classes and opportunities for internships. This gives you a better headstart and the experience to know whether your career path is the right one. 

   This school has not always been at the high +82.66% that it is now. It was developed slowly but surely by investors and students but having an overwhelming focus on the students which is weird because it is a for-profit school. My journey to getting into Grand Canyon University was a financial struggle but with tedious work, they were able to reach a price that I could afford on my own, which I am grateful. They invested in me so I invested in them. I have virtually made $9375.57, that is more than half of my tuition for two years and I only paid $62.67 for each 100 shares.

   Grand Canyon is a corporation that mass produces educated students in a variety of different styles and colors, promoting diversity at a reasonable price. This corporation creates jobs and eventually success by helping us form our own creative mindset. This school also provides students with a well-rounded education from pagan, Christian, and a variety of other religious viewpoints. This school is worth investing in, both in stocks and in life. So I encourage you or others to invest in Grand Canyon University. To reference previous articles, it is far from what people would call sin stock, frankly, it is the opposite and can make you a hell of a lot of money. 

Bieber-approved. 

A cure for wellness

   Cancer is one of the many leading causes of death around the world and the number one leading cause for children in the United States. This disease is heavily funded and most times the topic of terminal illness. Cancer has been normalized to the point we are blinded by how it is actually beneficial. Beneficial? of course, it is. Why terminate an illness that makes people wealthy?

   In 2012, cancer made 124.6 billion dollars and in 2014, 895 billion dollars a year, only spending 1.8 billion in prevention costs. They are really making bank on the deaths of millions. The cost for a well-known cancer research organization to run tests is $22,874,676 a year given through donations and outside funding. A small portion of what cancer earns and there is no definite proof that this money goes directly towards the cause of cancer research. "National audit office report indicated that we do not know enough about how the money is spent and whether it is spent wisely and for the benefits of patients," meaning that is "research" could ultimately be for nothing. This research consists of studying the dieting patterns of healthy people and people with cancer and comparing the substances within the food to trace it back to cancer. Then doing tests on healthy people with this information, having them eat the cancer-prone food and the cancer prevention food. Each group not knowing what they are given. Each section of research is consequently disclosed with something along the lines of "the accuracy of this experiment does not directly help to find a cure," not at all reassuring. 

    All they are actually certain of is that if you eat your veggies, you have a possibility of not getting cancer...a possibility. When the goal for curing cancer was actually for the benefit of patients rather than a face for increasing income from "treatments," they were shut down and shut up. "A great deal of research is covered up, potential cures are ignored because there is far more money in perpetuating illness than curing it."
                                                   -mic drop


    It is ironic that the movie "A Cure for Wellness" came out while I write this because just like cancer research it is only benefiting the person, not at risk and leaving the patients in a loop of cancer "cures" while they go broke. 

      My grandma was one for being cured of cancer multiple times but never long enough for it to make a difference. Her cancer had a huge effect on my grandparent's financial situation. They went from living in a house that was oversized and for the time being, comfortable to a trailer park in the scary part of Olivehurst. But it was all for nothing. As the money paid for cancer, my grandma progressively got worse. Before she got cancer, she was always health conscience. She ate mainly fruit, vegetables, and fish all of these big on the list of cancer prevention foods. So, to me the research does not add up, nor is it effective or worth the millions that could be used in actually using possible cures which have been put off. And as March comes around, I remember her and how if people were not so focused on how much money they make and more on the lives of millions, she might still be here. 

An eye for an eye, a debt for a debt

  Alexander Hamilton was the most influential and controversial man in history and those were his best qualities; as told in "Villainous business." His ideas on how to rid this country's debt were unthought of and for most people unacceptable. He pulled ideas from developed nations in which we were feuding and sought to seek peace with them in order to establish foreign trade, talk about backward thinking. He created an incentive for the people, to unknowingly want to pay for the debt the revolution caused. To give credit and expect people to pay it back with interest, what a thought. In that day and age, Hamilton was almost laughable when it came to his ideas. Due to his new ideas, people began to think he was scheming against them through a funding system and they gossiped and bickered on his intentions but this did not stop him, he persevered. He also proposed luxury taxes on items like alcohol and tea and way later this would spread to things like feminine products which is totally sexist but you know, at least we can help the debt this way. Hamilton also established a start to our taxes and refunds. Washington and Hamilton shared similar ideas on how they wanted to build our country, to get all states into one nation; check, to pay off the debt in a timely manor; check (well the revolutions debt), create a navy and army; check, and harmony among its people; mostly check. Hamilton set the stage (not just in the play) for all of these issues in his 'villainous business.

  While reading this passage, a strange character came to mind, his catch phrase, "better than I deserve" rang in my ears. Dave Ramsey; the master debt defeater. I could not help to think what if he was in 
Hamilton's place? The short answer would be this country would go to hell because he is woefully unqualified. Ramsey's ideas on how to rid debt now but at the time our nation did not have a steady income to back itself so his 'baby steps' would collapse on themselves. And I know that is Dave Ramsey were around in Hamilton's day, he would be one of the many to reject his ideas........mostly the ones about credit. In Ramsey's book, credit is the equivalent to the devil. 

  Alexander Hamilton had an extraordinary way of thinking and innovating thought process which needs to be reintroduced today. He attacked debt by creating debt among small things that would eventually pay for themselves later and profit the national fund. He approached things differently without thought of disapproval. He had a great support system, as well as many who disagreed but that never stopped him. He worked for the good of the country as a whole and for her people and without his ideals, we would not be as established, we would not be properly informed about money or have a banking system, and we would not be where we stand today. Thank you, Alexander Hamilton.

follow up marriage issue

   Basing a marriage solely on your love for "god" and another person is like setting a trap in which it is "morally" wrong to escape. To say a pagan marriage is selfish is to say our choice means nothing when the standing for all Christian belief is that God gave free will to man, to make their own choices, to love whom they want to love, to do as they please but know the consequences. 

  It was discussed that for pagan individuals; marriage is merely the next social step on the ladder of life but this is less true than that of a Christian. "As Christians, we don’t use statistics to determine our morality, but you would expect that doing the right thing would demonstrate itself in some form of success ( Scott Turansky)." Success being that god will see that they have suffered through a marriage and done the right thing by him, for him, with him. It sounds like some kind of widespread state farm commercial to dignify that the Christian way is the right way, the only way. To get married because "It is the Christian thing to do." But other than it being the Christian thing to do where are your intentions, what are your motives, what is your plan!


   Culture is mainly a concept created by the imagination of man followed by tradition, ceremony,etc....  The Christian culture does not approach marriage in a way that would seem generally accepted but because it is so widely known this idea has been given many lights that have the possibility of being the cause of a number of divorces. By following the rules of basically a glorified book club, in which little to known have direct experience with the love they talk so highly of.

  My dad once told me that marriage is meant for childbearing, nothing more. To procreate and dominate, the Christian way. I use dominate loosely as a more intense word for convert/spread word of this god. 

  Say that you are in a Christian marriage and you have had a child or children and one is not exactly the cookie cutter Jesus you were hoping. Does this mean your due diligence was not done? You have only made it to Samaria but not the ends of the Earth. Is your marriage all for nothing? In the end, that is for you to decide but basing it on a love that a god who may or may not exist without having directly experienced this 'so-called love' makes little sense. 

  In a pagan relationship, marriage is a choice, we have the will to marry or be married rather than making in another step in the seven sacraments.

Make love, not divorce

 It's spring, the flowers are coming into bloom and men and women of every age are reserving the day. The day that they become one in holy matrimony. But most of these people are in such a rush they forget to grow up. "Marriage are more likely to last longer when people marry at an older age, have higher education and earn more," the article Divorce rates increase if you're under twenty-five. There is no race to get married and if you find yourself in a situation where it seems like a must-have, you need to check your motives.

 Religion aside, you can be with someone and have sexual relations without making it such a shameful act. People often use this as a motive for marriage, as a way to satisfy the needs or urges but it makes so sense if this is a motive for marriage. If you plan to get married, the motive is important so rethink your motive and I suggest waiting. 

 Females and males have different ages in which the are considered mature or "all put together." Females being 18 and males being 21 but that does not mean you are ready for the responsible of marriage. "Sixty percent of marriages for couples between the ages 20 and 25 ends in divorce," that's more than half and should be taken into account.

Time is essential when it comes to your intended spouse. People are dynamic, constantly changing. The person you thought you knew inside and out could change in a manner of minutes. This is why when it comes to marriage, we should take our time with the person or not get married at all. 

 My father was married twice and both ended because of the horrible reason behind it. The first marriage was when he was 21 on the account of well, me. Immediately after they took the alter. He did not know this woman and it was merely a case of too much alcohol and no protection. Because of this, he's where he is today. Barely any college on account of his kids and TIME. Marriage is a death to youth, freedom, and ability to do as one pleases.  Marriage makes you one with your spouse, the time for childish dreams and freedom are over. His second marriage started and ended within months. This one was not a shotgun wedding, though, it was a case of "love", which is maybe sweet but its also stupid. 

 I do not believe in love and I think marriage is merely a scam to use on your tax returns but in the end, marriage is a choice where we live so choose wisely.

TOMs, are they for the people?

   In 2006, Blake Mycoskie the founded the idea of one for one. One for one being the TOMs organization where if you buy a pair of shoes, a pair will be donated to a person in need. This is why the price of shoes range from fifty dollars or more because the price without One for one would be half that. My issue with this is that the hookworm epidemic is what the whole One for one organization stands on but the money the collect from selling the shoe could ultimately eliminate the issue altogether.

   Over sixty million pairs of TOMs have been given to people in need only beginning to touch the issue of hookworm. There are over seven hundred million people around the world dealing with this issue, a significant amount compared to the number of shoes given to help this issue. That leaves six hundred and forty million people still at risk of attaining hookworm. 

  The only gain in this whole situation is for TOMs and their income. The manufacturing price for these shoes is seven dollars and fifty cents for a pair being made out of canvas paper for the structure and design and organic cotton for the base. The quality is woefully inadequate though the outside looks decently fashionable; not lasting more than a couple months and leaving their mission uncompleted after the first few months.

  The cost for roads in third world countries is three hundred million that's a little more than half of the people who are affected by hookworm being again, seven hundred million people. Since TOMs only brings shoes to select a number of Christian schools, let us say that the school has a number of 1000 kids and each kid gets is promised a pair of TOMs that's a total of twenty-five thousand dollars in shoes being that each pair alone would be at least twenty-five dollars. With the money they used to supply shoes at least the roads in that area could be fixed and maintained and get closer to solving the problem. Making these roads will make a bigger difference than a shoe made out of very destructive material. And if each person donated a dollar at most and least two countries can have the ability to build lasting roads and control the hookworm epidemic; the whole reason behind One for one. 


  I believe that the One for one organization is more a scam for a good name rather than an ability to help those in need. Despite all the children that have been given shoes it does not make a difference if they do not have a lasting solution. Seeing that they were or those who purchased two pairs of TOMs for one donated over sixty million pairs for about twenty-five dollars per shoe and the manufacturing price being seven dollars and fifty cents, the TOMs organization have made $1, 050,000,000 altogether. With this in mind TOMs if a public stock would be a great investment even if their morals are not in the right place.